Upset in Detroit

Detroit's youthful, grinny Mayor Edward Jeffries got through the nonpartisan primaries last week. But--as almost no one expected--he finished a poor second to up-&-coming John Francis James Fitz-Gerald. Reasons for the upset: 1) C.I.O. members voting for FitzGerald; 2) Negroes voting against Jeffries.

In two previous campaigns, Mayor Jeffries won by a 2-to-1 majority, with the support of the C.I.O. as well as the white-collar and uppercrust vote. But this time the restive, powerful United Auto Workers (C.I.O.) wanted a man of their own. They picked FitzGerald, a balding Irish attorney who showed surprising strength in 1940 as a Democratic opponent to veteran Senator Arthur Vandenberg. U.A.W. gathered a $30,000 war chest, lavished most of it on last week's primaries, and got out the biggest local labor vote since 1937.

One vote C.I.O. did not have to encourage: the Negro. Rightly or wrongly, Negroes believe they received a bad deal from Jeffries in the June 20 race riot (TIME, June 28) and in the critical months since. And Detroit's politically conscious 150,000 Negroes constitute 9% of the city's population. In Negro precincts, FitzGerald whipped Jeffries 20-to-1. (Examples: 112-1; 148-13; 189-12; 259-5).

Could Jeffries overtake FitzGerald's 37,000 primary lead in the November finals? Political wiseacres hesitated to guess. Jeffries' backers believe their overconfident supporters didn't bother to vote in the primaries.

This file is automatically generated by a robot program, so reader's discretion is required.